Johnson:  English 102

 

Reviewer’s Name: ________________________________________

 

Author and Essay Title: ____________________________________

 

Guidelines for Peer Review

 

1.                 TOPIC:       What is the General Subject of this essay?  Does it change from one page to another?  If it does, which subject seems to be best suited to the paper?

 

 

 

 

 

2.                 THESIS:      Does this project have a thesis, main idea, or overall mood?  Mark the thesis in the paper with a highlighter.  Is it arguable?  Does the thesis present its topic and comment on it? 

 

 

 

 

 

a.)   Evaluate the thesis for unity and specificity. Suggest how the author might refine the thesis, concentrating on the issue of specificity.

 

 

 

 

 

3.       INTRODUCTION:         What does the opening do to attract readers and help them predict the essay’s subject, purpose, thesis, organization, or style?  What changes would make the introduction more interesting to readers?

 

 

4.       ORGANIZATION:         What are the major points of the author’s argument?  To figure out the organization of the argument, mark the major ideas in the margins of each paragraph.  Copy the list of major ideas you made in the margins of the paper in the space below (in other words, create an outline for this essay), and briefly explain what the organization reveals about the argument the author is making.

 

          I.

 

 

 

          II.

 

 

 

 

          III.

 

 

 

 

          IV.

 

 

 

 

          V.

 

 

 

5.                 Consider whether each paragraph focuses on a single point and says all that needs to be said about it.  What changes would improve the paragraphs in this essay or make them fit more smoothly with preceding or following paragraphs?

 

 

 

 

 

 

6.       EVIDENCE:          What are the main points the author uses to support his/her thesis?

 

 

i.)

 

 

ii.)

 

 

iii.)

 

 

 

 

a.)               Does the essay provide enough detail to illustrate, explain, or support its main point?  Is anything missing?  What should be added? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

b.)              With a highlighter, identify the quotations (and paraphrased or summarized evidence) which the author uses to support his/her argument.

 

 

 

c.)              How much of the essay is highlighted (in other words, how much is pure evidence?)?  Comment on your observations.  For each quotation there should be at least twice as much interpretation of the evidence. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

d.)              Directly on the author’s paper, circle the significant words in the quotations, suggest additional ways to interpret the quotations, use the margins to ask questions about the quotations.  Identify the quotations that you believe the author could eliminate. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7.       PLANS FOR REVISION:        Study the author’s first draft and the comments you made about the evidence and its interpretation.  Write a new thesis statement for the author and give him/her a new 3 point organizational plan for the next draft. 

 

          New thesis:

 

 

          A.)

 

 

 

          B.)

 

 

 

          C.)